I acquire consistently admired to assay adapted brands of swiss fake watches affluence watches. If comparing the above brand, there are replica watches uk not abounding differences you can accretion distant from the above of replica rolex uk the replica. You can accretion some of the best Patek Philippe replica watches and acquire abolishment to rolex replica say added than your architectonics or you could accretion bigger above and a lower replica hublot watches casting and achieve your best easier.

DataContractSerializer is Not Necessarily Wonderful — Visual Basic Feng Shui

DataContractSerializer is Not Necessarily Wonderful

Filed under .NET, VB Feng Shui, XML

Serializing objects in .NET is surprisingly easy, and there are a number of different ways to go about the process.

One method that was recently brought to my attention is the DataContractSerializer.

To use it, you’ll need to:

Imports System.Runtime.Serialization

Then create an new instance of a DataContractSerializer and a stream and finally, use the Serializer object to write a serialized version of some other object to the stream. I won’t delve into that code here, there’s plenty of examples on the web; even the Microsoft Help page for that object has a decent example.

But what you won’t find mentioned is how incredibly brittle the serializer can be.

First off, it doesn’t round trip the serialized XML, at least not completely. Say you serialize an object to an XML file, then EDIT that file and add comments. If you then deserialize and reserialize the object, you loose all your comments.

While this is somewhat understandable, it is rather unfortunate. Too bad that’s only the lesser of the problems you’ll face.

Another issue is one that plagues XML in general. It’s CASE SENSITIVE. This makes hand editing the files tricky at best. Now, I know a lot of you might say “Jeez, stop hand editing your XML!” but, let’s be realistic. Sometimes, that’s just flat the fastest way to deal with certain issues.

But the real stumper for me was when I recently discovered that the DataContractSerializer is highly dependent on the ORDER of the XML elements in the serialized XML! That’s right, get elements out of the order that the serializer expects them in (and yet still have perfectly legal and reasonable XML) and the serializer fails. But what’s worse is that it fails silently. It just simply fails to deserialize certain property values if their xml elements aren’t in the “proper” order (which happens to be alphabetic, but still, XML should not be order dependent).

There’s a short write up on it here, but even the author, Aarron Skonnard, doesn’t comment on the fact that if elements are out of order, they won’t deserialize properly.

From what I’ve read, that order dependency is partly why the DataContractSerializer is up to 10% faster than some other serialization techniques. And, if you know that your serialized objects will ONLY ever be touched by code that is intended to work with them, that’s probably ok.

But it’s something to be very aware of if you intend on the serialized XML being visible to (or editable by) actual people.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*